Services Listing No. 52: “FDI in retailing and inflation: The case of India,” by Nandita Dasgupta. No. 53: “Knowledge, FDI and catching-up strategies,” by Francisco Sercovich. No. 54: “Investment incentives and the global competition for capital,” by Kenneth P. Thomas. No. 55: “FDI stocks are a biased measure of MNE affiliate activity: A response,” by Mira Wilkins. No. 56: “Towards the successful implementation of the updated OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises,” by Tadahiro Asami. No. 57: “Nation states and nationality of MNEs,” by Seev Hirsch. No. 58: “The public law challenge: Killing or rethinking international investment law?,” by Stephan W. Schill. No. 59: “The (lack of) women arbitrators in investment treaty arbitration,” by Gus Van Harten. No. 60: “National companies or foreign affiliates: Whose contribution to growth is greater?,” by Alice H. Amsden. No. 61: “Different investment treaties, different effects,” by Clint Peinhardt and Todd Allee. No. 62: “The unbalanced dragon: China’s uneven provincial and regional FDI performance,” by Karl P. Sauvant, Chen Zhao and Xiaoying Huo. No. 63: “Is Chinese FDI pushing Latin America into natural resources?,” by Miguel Pérez Ludeña. No. 64: “State-controlled entities control nearly US$ 2 trillion in foreign assets,” by Karl P. Sauvant and Jonathan Strauss. No. 65: “The standing of state-controlled entities under the ICSID Convention: Two key considerations,” by Mark Feldman. No. 66: “Does it matter who invests in your country?,” by Kalman Kalotay. No. 67: “The Arab Spring: How soon will foreign investors return?,” by Paul Antony Barbour, Persephone Economou, Nathan M. Jensen, and Daniel Villar. No. 68: “Economic patriotism: Dealing with Chinese direct investment in the United States,” by Sophie Meunier et al. No. 69: “The times they are a-changin’ — again — in the relationships between governments and multinational enterprises: From control, to liberalization to rebalancing,” by Karl P. Sauvant. No. 70: “FDI, catch-up growth stages and stage-focused strategies,” by Terutomo Ozawa. No. 71: “Much ado about nothing? State-controlled entities and the change in German investment law,” by Thomas Jost. No. 72: “Roll out the red carpet and they will come: Investment promotion and FDI inflows,” by Torfinn Harding and Beata Javorcik. No. 73: “Law at two speeds: Legal frameworks regulating foreign investment in the global South,” by Lorenzo Cotula. No. 74: “Starting anew in international investment law,” by M Sornarajah. No. 75: “Attracting FDI through BITs and RTAs: Does treaty content matter?,” by Axel Berger, Matthias Busse, Peter Nunnenkamp, and Martin Roy. No. 76: “A good business reason to support mandatory transparency in extractive industries,” by Perrine Toledano and Julien Topal. No. 77: “A new economic nationalism? Lessons from the PotashCorp decision in Canada,” by Sandy Walker. No. 78: “Reconciling IMF rules and international investment agreements: An innovative derogation for capital controls,” by Elizabeth L. Broomfield. No. 79: “Absent from the discussion: The other half of investment promotion,” by Lise Johnson. No. 80: “State-controlled entities as “investors” under international investment agreements,” by Jo En Low. No. 81: “Is China’s outward investment in oil a global security concern?,” by Ilan Alon and Aleh Cherp. No. 82: “Evaluate Sustainable FDI to Promote Sustainable Development,” by John M. Kline. No. 83: “Untying the land knot: Turning investment challenges into opportunities for all citizens,” by Xiaofang Shen. No. 84: “Inward foreign direct investment: Does it enable or constrain domestic technology entrepreneurship?,” by Saurav Pathak, André Laplume and Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira. No. 85: “A China – US bilateral investment treaty: A template for a multilateral framework for investment?,” by Karl P. Sauvant and Huiping Chen. No. 86: “EU investment agreements and the search for a new balance: A paradigm shift from laissez-faire liberalism toward embedded liberalism?,” by Catharine Titi. No. 87: “Trying to change the rules for responding to arbitration unilaterally: The proposed new framework for investor-state dispute settlement for the EU,” by Ralph Alexander Lorz. No. 88: “The compensatory nature of moral damages in investor-state arbitration,” by Jarrod Wong. No. 89: “Investor-state dispute settlement: A government’s dilemma,” by Joachim Karl. No. 90: “A business perspective on a China – US bilateral investment treaty,” by Shaun E. Donnelly. No. 91: “The Arab Awakening, act II: Time to move more boldly on investment,” by Anthony O’Sullivan and Alexander Böhmer. No. 92: “Labor provisions in bilateral investment treaties: Does the new US Model BIT provide a template for the future?,” by Vid Prislan and Ruben Zandvliet. No. 93: “How the private sector is changing Chinese investment in Africa,” by Xiaofang Shen. No. 94: “Common structures of investment law in an age of increasingly complex treaty-making ,” by Stephan Schill and Marc Jacob. No. 95: “How do consumer-focused multinational enterprises affect emerging markets?,” by Terutomo Ozawa. No. 96: “Infrastructure for ore: Benefits and costs of a not-so-original idea,” by Louis T. Wells. No. 97: “Myopic reliance on natural resources: How African countries can diversify inward FDI,” by Abdoul’ Ganiou Mijiyawa. No. 98: “Do host countries really benefit from inward foreign direct investment?,” by Byungchae Jin, Francisco García and Robert Salomon. No. 99: “The global significance of transatlantic investment rules,” by Jonathan (Josh) S. Kallmer. No. 100: “Cost allocation in investment arbitration: Back toward diversification,” by Baiju S. Vasani and Anastasiya Ugale. No. 101: “The need for an international investment consensus-building process,” by Karl P. Sauvant and Federico Ortino. Pagination Previous page ‹‹ Page 4 Next page ›› Sort Category Type Filter Filter Filter All Letter Services, showing - Clear filters Filter Filter Filter edit edit edit edit
